
"As they have dared, so shall I dare. Dare to tell the truth, as I have pledged to tell it, in full, since the normal channels of justice have failed to do so. My duty is to speak out; I do not wish to be an accomplice in this travesty." ​
"Truth and justice, so ardently longed for! How terrible it is to see them trampled, unrecognized and ignored!" Emile Zola. J'Accuse, 1898
​
​

​
-
Application for leave to Appeal Rouleau: It deals with the Constitutional Challenge of s.136(1) (a) (i), (b), (c) and s.136 (4) of the CJA regarding the “Open Justice” Constitutional Principle and the rights of a litigant to obtain and disseminate audio and video recordings of their own hearings. The restrictions in Appellate courts, Superior Courts of Justice, and the Ontario Courts of Justice for applications or motions where there are no witnesses, no jury, and no publication ban are an affront to the deeply rooted principles contained in S.2(b) of the Charter. Furthermore, the punishment under s. 136 (4) constitutes an egregious liberty infringement on Canadian’s rights to the liberty and security of their person under s.7 and 12 of the Charter. It is preposterous to threaten Canadians with a cruel punishment of $25,000.00 fine and/or six months imprisonment for exercising a fundamental right guaranteed by the Charter.
-
Second Application Leave to Appeal: It deals with the usurped rights of 5 million unionized Canadian employees by a cabal of union officials. Unionized Canadians are currently prohibited from access to justice and deprived of their constitutional rights under s. 2(b), 7, 15(1) and 24 of the Charter and of their fundamental human right to auto determination.
Decisions
​
-
Supreme Court of Canada File # 38727 February 13, 2020 Decision on Second Application for leave to appeal the 2018 ONCA 857 decision.