top of page
  • Arbitration: "Balanced" and "Judicial Review Proof" Decisions

  1. ​Interim Consent Award (Arbitrator Brown) April 11, 2013                 “unpublished”

  2. Brown Arbitration Award August 2, 2013 (First Award)                     “unpublished”

  3. Brown Arbitration Award July 23, 2015 (Second Award)                    “unpublished"

  • Human Rights Tribunal​ of Ontario (HRTO)

  1. Michail v. London District Catholic School Board, 2016 HRTO 745

  2. Michail v. Ontario English Catholic Teachers’ Association et Al, HRTO FILE: 2016-26028-           “unpublished”

  • ​Ontario Labour Relations Board (OLRB)

  1. Decision June 1st, 2016, 2016 CanLII 33611 (ON LRB)

  2. Decision August 19, 2016, 2016 CanLII 55618 (ON LRB)  

  3. Decision September 16, 2016, 2016 CanLII 62240 (ON LRB)   

  4. Decision October 11, 2016, 2016 CanLII 69183 (ON LRB)

  5. Decision February 8, 2017, 2017 CanLII 6507 (ON LRB)

  • London Superior Court of Justice

  1. Leitch J. Decision March 21, 2017                                       “unpublished”

  2. Grace J. 2017 ONSC 3986,  June 26, 2017                              

  3. Grace J. Decision August 9, 2017                                          “unpublished”

  4. Mitchell J. Decision January 11, 2021                                   “unpublished”

  • Ontario Court of Appeal (OCA)

  1. Paciocco J.A. Decision September 4, 2018                         “unpublished”

  2. Feldman, Pardu, Roberts JJ.A. October 25, 2018,  2018 ONCA 857

  3. Brown J.A. Decision M49750 November 23, 2018,  2018 ONCA 950

  4. Lauwers J.A. Decision dated February 13, 2019                  “unpublished”

  5. ​Rouleau, Miller Fairburn JJ.A. Decision April 24, 2019, 2019 ONCA 319

  • Supreme Court of Canada (SCC)

  1. Supreme Court of Canada File #38727   October 17, 2019     Decision on First Application for leave to appeal the 2019 ONCA 319 decision which deals with the Constitutional Challenge of s.136(1) (a) (i), (b), (c) and s.136 (4) of the CJA regarding the “Open Justice” Constitutional Principle and the rights of a litigant to obtain and disseminate audio and video recordings of their own hearings. The restrictions in Appellate courts, Superior Courts of Justice, and the Ontario Courts of Justice for applications or motions where there are no witnesses, no jury, and no publication ban are an affront to the deeply rooted principles contained in S.2(b) of the Charter. Furthermore, the punishment under s. 136 (4) constitutes an egregious liberty infringement on Canadian’s rights to the liberty and security of their person under s.7 and 12 of the Charter. It is preposterous to threaten Canadians with a cruel punishment of $25,000.00 fine and/or six months imprisonment for exercising a fundamental right guaranteed by the Charter.

  2. Supreme Court of Canada File  # 38727  February 13, 2020   Decision on Second Application for leave to appeal the 2018 ONCA 857 decision. It deals with the usurped rights of 5 million unionized Canadian employees by a cabal of union officials. Unionized Canadians are currently prohibited from access to justice and deprived of their constitutional rights under s. 2(b), 7, 15(1) and 24 of the Charter and of their fundamental human right to auto determination.

  • Vexatious Litigant Lawsuit: SLAPP (Startegic Lawsuit Against Public Participation)

  1. Hamilton Superior Court Motion to Transfer                         “unpublished”

bottom of page